A Unifying Approach to Axiomatic Non-expected Utility Theories: Correction and Comment

Calibration Results for Non-Expected Utility Theories∗

Rabin [23] proved that a low level of risk aversion with respect to small gambles leads to a high level of risk aversion with respect to large gambles. Rabin’s arguments strongly depend on expected utility theory, but we show in this paper that similar arguments apply to many non expected utility theories, and to a certain extent, to theories dealing with uncertainty as well.

non-corrective approach to pronunciation

the aim of this study has been to find answers for the following questions: 1. what is the effect of immediate correction on students pronunciation errors? 2. what would be the effect of teaching the more rgular patterns of english pronunciation? 3. is there any significant difference between the two methods of dealing with pronuciation errore, i. e., correction and the teaching of the regular ...

Non-Expected Utility Theories: Weighted Expected, Rank Dependent, and, Cumulative Prospect Theory Utility by

Non-expected Utility Theories: Weighted Expected, Rank Dependent, and, Cumulative Prospect Theory Utility

Axiomatic Foundations for a Class of Generalized Expected Utility: Algebraic Expected Utility

In this paper, we provide two axiomatizations of algebraic expected utility, which is a particular generalized expected utility, in a von NeumannMorgenstern setting, i.e. uncertainty representation is supposed to be given and here to be described by a plausibility measure valued on a semiring, which could be partially ordered. We show that axioms identical to those for expected utility entail t...